When you send money abroad, the same payment might pass through dozens of systems, each interpreting data its own way. The result? Lost details, manual fixes, delays. That’s where ISO 20022 comes in. It’s the standard that says: let’s all speak the same payments language. And after 20+ years in development, the final countdown is here (it could’ve been Europe’s lyrics here, but it is an article). With just three weeks until SWIFT’s November 22, 2025 deadline, the end of the coexistence period marks a critical point.
Throughout 2025, adoption accelerated, reaching over 60% of cross-border payment traffic by September, as institutions worldwide raced to meet the November 22, 2025 deadline.
What Is ISO 20022?
Put simply, ISO 20022 is an open global standard for financial messaging, especially payments. Instead of short, generic payment messages, it supports rich, structured data, where every field has meaning: sender, receiver, reason, invoice number, even full postal address when needed. Legacy formats (like the old MT messages on SWIFT) just didn’t carry that richness. The new standard helps systems understand what the payment is for, not just how much and where it’s going.
According to SWIFT, “It uses modern, mainstream XML technology and supports improved analytics, less manual intervention, more accurate compliance processes, higher resilience and improved fraud prevention measures”.
In short: it upgrades payments from “just moving money” to “moving money with context”.
Why Is ISO 20022 A Big Deal?
There are several converging factors:
- Global interoperability. Payment systems across countries had wildly different formats. ISO 20022 aligns them so data flows cleanly across borders, networks and institutions. As Citi puts it: it “introduces a new global common standard for cross-border transactions”;
- Richer data means fewer errors. When all the fields are defined and structured you are less likely to have truncated addresses, missing intermediary fields or unclear instructions. Banks and fintechs can automate more;
- Compliance and risk management. With more detailed data, institutions can do better AML/sanctions screening, monitoring, analytics. For example: “Structured data fields improve transparency, reducing false positives in fraud detection and AML compliance”;
- Efficiency gains. Rich data helps straight-through processing, improves reconciliation, gives better transparency for corporates and banks alike. So while “standardising payment messages” might sound boring, it really is a modernisation for how money moves globally.
What It Means For Banks?
For many banks, migrating has been a multi-year transformation:
- Core system overhauls to send and receive ISO 20022-formatted messages;
- Data standardisation across addresses, beneficiary data, and payment reason codes – inaccurate or missing fields create bigger issues in ISO 20022 workflows;
- The November deadline is now: SWIFT’s coexistence period ends on November 22 2025, after which cross-border payments via SWIFT must use ISO 20022 MX format. Institutions still relying on MT format face charges and operational risks;
- Competitive stakes: Banks offering richer data analytics, faster reconciliation, and better transparency through ISO 20022 are gaining ground. According to Citi, 89% of banks expect to lose at least 5% of cross-border market share to fintechs if they fail to modernise.
The reality: by September 2025, over 60% of cross-border payment traffic was using ISO 20022 format, up from 38,5% at the end of April. However, many institutions are still using translation services rather than native processing, limiting the full benefits of the standard. The November 22nd deadline marks not the end, but the beginning of true ISO 20022 value realization.
Cross-Border Payments & Real-Time Tails: What Changes?
- With ISO 20022 deployed, cross-border payments can carry more detail end-to-end. That means less manual follow-up, fewer queries, improved tracking;
- For real-time or instant payment systems, the structured data in ISO 20022 supports enhanced use cases (wallets, cards, digital currencies). For example, Citi observes that ISO 20022 MX is used for virtually all payment types: wire, instant, even wallet/cross-border. (Citi);
Plus, SWIFT’s “CBPR+” (Cross-Border Payments and Reporting Plus) defines the specific implementation rules in cross-border payments, establishing standardized message formats and usage guidelines that ensure data consistency across the entire correspondent banking chain. (Swift)
As the November deadline arrives, institutions still expecting legacy formats face operational challenges.
Challenges We Need To Talk About
- Legacy systems. Many banks and corporates still run systems designed for MT messages. Mapping to ISO 20022 can involve code and data work;
- Data quality. Richer formats demand quality. If your address fields, payment references or bank data are inconsistent, the shift to structured messaging will expose those problems. See the address-format issues discussed in a RedCompass Labs article;
- Correspondent chain risk. Even if your local systems are ISO 20022-ready, counterparties or upstream systems may not be. That means your richer data can get truncated if a participant only accepts legacy format. That undermines the benefits. (FXC Intelligence);
- Project and operational overhead. It’s not just “flip a switch”. There’s testing, partner coordination, message-translation tools, fallback strategies. Most leading institutions have completed their migrations, but many mid-sized banks and corporates are still in transition, creating a critical window of operational risk;
- Shake-out is still ahead. The “end of coexistence” is a milestone, but the real value (rich data, full automation) only comes when most participants are fully native ISO 20022. Until then you’ll have mixed mode. (FXC Intelligence)
Looking Ahead And Why ISO 20022 Matters For The Future
It is not just a format update. As the industry completes this transition, it’s becoming clear this is enabling infrastructure for the next generation of payments.
- Real-time payments, wallet-to-wallet payment rails, instant cross-border flows: they all benefit from richer data;
- Value-added services (fraud detection, straight-through processing, supply-chain payments) will lean on the extra fields ISO 20022 offers;
- Competition is shifting: banks and fintechs that treat ISO 20022 as a launchpad rather than a compliance burden will gain an edge.
n short: if you’re doing payments in 2025 and beyond, ISO 20022 is the difference between “we just move money” and “we move money smartly”.
Key Take-Aways
- ISO 20022 is the new global standard for payments messaging: richer, structured, more capable;
- SWIFT ends its coexistence period in November 22, 2025. After this date, cross-border payments via SWIFT must use ISO 20022 MX format, not legacy MT messages;
- The benefits are real: better data, improved automation, stronger compliance, faster flows;
- The challenges are tangible: system upgrades, data-cleanup, partner-coordination, mixed-mode during transition;
- For institutions that completed migration the focus now shifts to native implementation and unlocking the full benefits of structured data. For those still using translation services, the priority is migrating to native ISO 20022 processing to avoid ongoing costs and realize the standard’s full value.
Related Lerpal articles:
Contact our team to discuss how we can help you build secure, compliant and scalable financial features.
